Launched in 2020 with an initial $200 million pool, the TikTok Creator Fund was the platform's bold answer to creator monetization, designed to reward viral talent and foster loyalty. Unlike a grant or direct ad-revenue share, it operated as a dynamic revenue-sharing feature where TikTok allocated funds directly from its own resources to eligible creators. The goal was simple: incentivize the "best and brightest" to keep producing authentic, engaging content that drives the app's growth, with a pledged expansion to $1 billion over three years.
This fund represented TikTok's commitment to its creator community, but it was never a straightforward paycheck. Payments were calculated on a sliding scale based on a cocktail of factors, from view counts and engagement metrics to geographic location. While it promised a way to monetize passion, the reality for many was a complex system that often yielded minimal returns, sparking both hope and frustration across the creator landscape.
At its core, the Creator Fund's payment model was shrouded in some mystery, but key mechanics emerged from creator experiences and platform guidelines. Earnings were tied entirely to organic performance—no paid ads involved. TikTok used a proprietary algorithm to distribute funds based on video views, authenticity of those views (ruling out bots), and engagement signals like likes, comments, and shares. The more videos published by fund participants, the more the fixed pool was divided, meaning individual payouts could fluctuate widely.
Applying was relatively straightforward for those who qualified: users needed a Pro account, could navigate to Creator Tools in settings, and click the "TikTok Creator Fund" button to submit an application. Once approved, a dashboard allowed tracking of metrics and earnings, with payouts available via PayPal or Zelle once the account accrued a minimum of $10. This process emphasized accessibility but didn't guarantee substantial income.
Not every creator could tap into the fund; TikTok set specific gates to ensure participants had proven traction. The baseline requirements were non-negotiable: creators had to be at least 18 years old and reside in an eligible country—initially the US, UK, France, Germany, Spain, or Italy. On top of that, a minimum of 10,000 followers and 100,000 authentic video views in the last 30 days were mandatory, along with adherence to community guidelines and terms of service.
These barriers meant the fund was reserved for creators who had already built a sizable, engaged audience. There was no cap on the number of participants, but the geographic and metric restrictions left many international or emerging creators out in the cold. It was a system designed to reward existing success rather than nurture up-and-coming talent.
Reports from the Creator Fund era paint a picture of modest, often disappointing payouts. On average, creators earned between $0.02 to $0.04 per 1,000 views, with some anecdotes dipping as low as a few cents. For perspective, a viral video hitting 5 million views might yield only $200 to $40,000 at best, but most creators saw far less. Prominent voices like Hank Green publicly criticized the fund, revealing he made about 2.5 cents per 1,000 views despite millions of followers.
Other examples highlighted the disparity: tech reviewer SuperSaf earned roughly $137 over 10 months with 25 million views, while mega-creator Mr. Beast netted around $14,910 in a similar period. These figures underscored that the fund was more about supplemental income than a livable wage, especially compared to platforms like YouTube, which shares ad revenue directly. The low payouts became a primary driver for TikTok's eventual overhaul of the system.
Every monetization tool has its trade-offs, and the Creator Fund was no exception. On the plus side, it offered an unlimited earnings potential with no cap on what top performers could make, serving as a tangible incentive to experiment with content and grow audiences. Additionally, being part of the fund added credibility, making creators more attractive for brand partnerships and collaborations.
However, the cons often outweighed the pros. The payouts were notoriously low, leading many to label it "beer money" rather than a serious income stream. Earnings were taxable income, requiring careful reporting come tax season. Most limiting was the strict eligibility, which excluded creators outside specific regions or with smaller followings. Ultimately, while it provided a foothold in monetization, it wasn't the golden ticket some hoped for.
By late 2023, TikTok began phasing out the Creator Fund in favor of the Creativity Program Beta, now known as the Creator Rewards Program. This shift responded directly to creator feedback about low payouts and lack of transparency. The new program focuses on rewarding longer-form, high-quality content—videos must be over one minute—with payouts skyrocketing to $0.40 to over $6.00 per 1,000 views, a 10-150x increase.
Eligibility tightened slightly, retaining the 10,000-follower and 100,000-view thresholds but adding geographic expansions to include Japan, South Korea, and Brazil. The old fund officially ended in 2025, with all enrolled creators invited to transition. This evolution marks TikTok's strategic pivot toward valuing watch time and originality, aligning more closely with creator economies on other platforms.
While the Creator Fund was a starting point, savvy creators explore multiple income streams on TikTok. Tips and Gifts allow fans to send virtual coins during lives or on profiles, with creators keeping 100% of amounts over $100. The TikTok Creator Marketplace facilitates brand deals, where influencers can earn from $100 to $10,000+ per campaign for sponsored content. Additionally, features like Series for premium content and direct merchandise sales offer diversified revenue.
These options often have lower barriers—some requiring only 1,000 recent views—and can be more lucrative than the fund ever was. By combining these tools, creators build sustainable businesses, leveraging TikTok not just for views but for meaningful partnerships and fan support. It's a reminder that monetization is multifaceted, requiring a blend of platform programs and entrepreneurial hustle.
The journey from the Creator Fund to today's programs highlights a broader trend: social platforms are maturing their creator economies to prioritize quality over quantity. For aspiring TikTokers, the key is to focus on building an authentic audience with engaging, longer-form content that meets new program criteria. While the fund is gone, its legacy lives on in a system that, albeit with higher stakes, offers real earning potential for those who adapt.
Innovative creators now treat TikTok as a launchpad, using insights from the fund era to diversify income through tips, brand deals, and cross-platform growth. The lesson is clear—monetization success hinges on understanding platform shifts, engaging communities deeply, and viewing programs like the Creator Rewards as tools in a larger toolkit. Embrace the evolution, create with passion, and let the metrics follow.